Some mornings, I wake up, and my ADHD brain is already running three parallel threads. Other days, I stare at my calendar and feel nothing but dread.
For years, I tried every productivity system. GTD. Time-blocking. The Pomodoro Technique. Notion templates that promised to “change my life.” They all helped temporarily. But none of them solved the core problem: I didn’t understand why certain things were hard for me.
Then I committed to something that felt almost embarrassingly simple: daily journaling with AI analysis.
Not the vague “write your feelings” kind. I built a structured system with templates, prompts, and weekly AI summaries. I used Claude for this, but ChatGPT, Gemini, or any other LLM would work fine—the specific tool doesn’t matter as much as the system itself.
After 90 days, my stress levels dropped significantly. I understood which types of meetings drained me, which conflicts I’d been avoiding for months, and what actually mattered for my career growth.
The best part? I can show you exactly how to replicate this.
What This Article Will Cover
I’m going to walk you through my complete system:
📋 The three daily journaling sessions (and why three beats one)
🎙️ Why I used voice recording instead of typing (game changer)
📝 My exact Notion templates with checklists
🤖 The AI prompts I used for analysis
📊 How to create weekly summaries that compound over time
🎯 The “Advisory Board” technique that gave me multiple perspectives
The Voice Recording Breakthrough
Here’s something I didn’t expect: I barely typed anything.
Most of my journaling was done via voice recording with the Superwhisper app. I’d just talk, and it would transcribe everything automatically.
Some mornings, I’d do this during my walk to the office. I’d talk about how I was feeling, what I was worried about, and what energy level I had. By the time I reached the office, I had a complete transcript ready to feed into the AI.
This changed everything.
Typing creates friction. You have to sit down, open an app, stare at a blank page. With voice, I could journal while making coffee, during my commute, even while pacing around my apartment. And you can do it while walking.
The transcripts weren’t perfect, but they didn’t need to be. The AI could work with raw, messy thoughts just fine.
If you’re someone who struggles with the blank page, try this. Just talk. Let the AI clean it up later.
Why Three Sessions Instead of One?
Most people approach journaling as a single brain dump. That never worked for me. My brain doesn’t process information linearly.
I split journaling into three 10-minute sessions throughout the day:
Morning session: Physical and mental orientation
Pre-work session: Career alignment and priorities
Evening session: Emotional processing and gratitude
Total time investment: ~30 minutes daily.
Each session had a different purpose and different prompts. Let me show you exactly what each one looked like.
Session 1: Morning Orientation (Right After Waking)
This wasn’t about productivity planning. It was about self-awareness before the day started.
Understanding my baseline state—energy, mood, physical sensations—helped me set realistic expectations instead of constantly overcommitting and failing.
My Morning Template in Notion
Here’s the checklist I used every morning:
☀️ Morning Check-In
What was my first thought after waking up?
How was my sleep? (duration, deep sleep, interruptions, dreams)
How do I feel mentally? (What am I excited about? What’s worrying or saddening me?)
What’s my energy level? (1-10 scale)
How do I feel physically? (Any pain? Taste in the mouth? What do I see? What do I hear?)
Then I’d either write or record 2-3 minutes of free-form thoughts expanding on anything that felt important.
My Morning AI Prompt
After capturing my thoughts in Notion, I’d copy the entry plus this prompt into Claude:
Above you’ll find my reflection immediately after waking up.
A) Analyze the language used in my recent entries. Pay attention to:
1. Recurring words or phrases
2. Emotional tone of the statements
3. Metaphors or analogies used
4. Words indicating limiting beliefs
B) Process this fragment for cognitive biases and self-confirmation tendencies, suggesting alternative approaches to these topics or potential traps my thinking might lead me into.
C) Conclude the morning reflection with:
- One high-quality paragraph of personalized advice from Marcus Aurelius that relates directly to my goals, challenges, and dilemmas
- One high-quality paragraph of personalized advice from Andrew Huberman addressing my current state
Keep responses direct and specific to my actual situation, not generic advice.The AI responses were surprisingly useful. Marcus Aurelius-style stoic reframes helped me separate what I could control from what I couldn’t. Huberman-style physiological advice reminded me that my brain state wasn’t just “mental” — it was tied to sleep, light exposure, and stress hormones.
After a few weeks, patterns emerged. The AI would notice: “You’ve mentioned waking up anxious three Mondays in a row. Sunday evening entries show you’re worrying about the week ahead. This is a pattern.”
That kind of meta-observation? I’d miss it every time.
Session 2: Pre-Work Career Alignment
This session happened right before I started working—usually around 8:30 AM, after coffee.
The goal wasn’t just “what do I need to do today?” It was “Does what I’m doing today actually matter for where I want to be in 5 years?”
My Pre-Work Template in Notion
💼 Pre-Work Planning
Quick gut check:
Subjective feeling about how today will go
Review of the to-do list
Calendar review: Difficult meetings (which ones and why); Easy meetings (which ones and why).
How does today relate to my plans for the whole week?
Then 2-3 minutes of voice recording or writing about what felt important or what I was avoiding.
My Pre-Work AI Prompt
This one was longer and more strategic:
1. What does my “Personal Advisory Board Framework” advise? Channel each board member and give me their perspective on:
- How can I use today’s difficulties and tasks to get closer to my goal of becoming Head of Engineering?
- Guidance for today—how can I end the day successfully?
- How would board members approach today’s priorities?
- How does this day relate to the whole week and entries from previous days?
2. Reality check and identification of false beliefs:
- Critically analyze your reflections and plans for the day. Are there any potential false beliefs or unrealistic expectations?
- What external factors or constraints might you be overlooking?
- How can you verify your assumptions about today’s priorities or challenges?
- Is there any discrepancy between your subjective feeling and objective data from your monitoring device? If so, what might that mean?
3. Conclude the reflection with thoughts from three random productivity specialists who will provide guidance on how to handle what I need to accomplish by the end of the day. Guidance must be highly personalized. I don’t want generalities. It must relate directly to my reflection and be grounded in context.
4. Provide a high-quality paragraph of advice from Andrew Huberman on how to take care of myself, considering my mental state, volume of tasks, and work responsibilities.
5. Define a list of “3 wins” for today. I want two proposals: from Jocko Willink, and Goldrat. I want very specific proposals not based on character stereotypes. I don’t want Jocko just talking about increasing ownership, etc.
6. Compare my day today and the challenges ahead to challenges faced by a famous historical figure. Give me interesting facts about this person—main successes and failures.
7. End with a motivational speech from Jocko Willink. The speech should relate directly to my reflection. I want it highly personalized and, if needed, incorporating knowledge from this project.
End with:
- One key area of personal or business development to focus on today, given your energy level and my long-term goals.The output gave me multiple lenses to view my day through. Sometimes Goldratt’s ruthless prioritization was what I needed.
The Jocko Willink speech at the end? Weirdly motivating. Even knowing it was AI-generated, having someone tell you “Good. You’re overwhelmed. That means you’re in the arena” helped me reframe anxiety as engagement.
Session 3: Evening Emotional Processing
This session happened before bed—usually around 8:30 PM.
The goal was simple: get emotions out of my head and onto paper so I could actually sleep.
Before I started this practice, I’d lie awake replaying difficult conversations or worrying about tomorrow’s conflicts. Processing it with AI gave me closure.
My Evening Template in Notion
🌙 Evening Reflection
How did today go?
Best moment of the day
Hardest moment of the day
Emotions during the hard moment (list + intensity 1-10)
How I handled it
What I learned
Gratitude:
Three things I’m grateful for today
Tomorrow preview:
One thing I’m looking forward to
One thing I’m worried about
Then 2-3 minutes of voice recording about whatever needed to come out—usually the stuff I’d been holding back all day.
My Evening AI Prompt
You are my reflection partner helping me process the day’s emotions and extract lessons.
Today’s reflection:
[PASTE EVENING ENTRY]
Help me with:
1. Emotion validation: Normalize what I’m feeling
2. Pattern check: Have I mentioned similar struggles recently?
3. Lesson extraction: What’s the real learning here beyond the surface?
4. Tomorrow prep: Based on what I’m worried about, what’s one thing I can do to feel more prepared?
Your tone should be warm but honest. Don’t sugarcoat patterns I need to address.The evening sessions were the most emotionally valuable.
After intense days—difficult 1-on-1s, conflicts with stakeholders, decisions I wasn’t sure about—just getting it out and having the AI reflect it back helped me let go.
The AI would often say things like: “You handled that conversation exactly how you wanted to based on your Tuesday entry, where you wrote about being more direct with feedback. You’re actually doing what you said you wanted to do.”
That kind of validation isn’t just nice—it’s necessary. We’re terrible at recognizing our own progress.
The Weekly Summary: Where the Magic Happened
Every Sunday, I’d do something crucial: create a weekly summary artifact.
Here’s why this mattered: Human memory is terrible at spotting patterns. We remember the dramatic moments but miss the subtle, repetitive issues that are actually costing us the most.
AI excels at exactly this kind of pattern recognition.
My Weekly Summary Process
Step 1: Throughout the week, I’d have one ongoing conversation with Claude where I’d paste each day’s entries after running them through my daily prompts.
Step 2: On Sunday, I’d ask Claude to create a summary artifact using this prompt:
Review this week’s journaling entries and create a comprehensive weekly summary.
Structure:
**Week of [dates]**
**Key Patterns Observed:**
- Energy: [trends in energy levels, sleep, focus]
- Emotional: [recurring emotional states, triggers]
- Behavioral: [habits, avoidances, breakthroughs]
- Career: [strategic vs tactical time allocation]
**Notable Insights:**
- [3-5 significant realizations from this week]
**Recurring Themes:**
- [Issues or topics that appeared multiple times]
**Action Items to Consider:**
- [2-3 concrete things I might address next week]
**Questions for Deeper Reflection:**
- [1-2 questions I should sit with]
Be specific. Quote from my entries when relevant. Flag anything that seems like a pattern I’m not seeing.Step 3: I’d take that artifact and add it to Claude’s project knowledge.
This created a searchable database of my own patterns over time.
How Project Knowledge Transformed Everything
Here’s where the system became genuinely powerful.
After 4-8 weeks of adding weekly summaries to project knowledge, Claude could reference my patterns from months ago.
Let me give you a concrete example:
In week 6, I had a conflict with one of my senior developers. He pushed back aggressively on a technical decision in front of the whole team. I felt disrespected and avoided addressing it directly.
In week 10, the same developer did it again—different topic, same dynamic. I mentioned it in my evening journal: “This happened again. I don’t know why I keep avoiding this conversation.”
When I ran that through Claude, it said: “Looking at your week 6 summary, you had an identical situation with this developer. You wrote then that you were worried about ‘damaging the relationship by being too direct.’ You’re now in week 10 with the same pattern. The relationship is already damaged by the avoidance. The conversation you’re avoiding is probably less scary than two more months of this.”
I’d completely forgotten the week 6 incident. But the AI remembered because it was in my July summary.
That observation pushed me to finally have the conversation. Turns out, the developer had no idea he was coming across that way. He thought he was just being “passionate about quality.” One 20-minute conversation completely reset our dynamic.
That’s the power of project knowledge. It connects dots you can’t see because you’re too close to the problem.
The “Advisory Board” Technique
Here’s one more technique that made a huge difference: I created a virtual “Advisory Board.”
I defined a list of people and philosophies I respect and added them to Claude’s project knowledge:
My Advisory Board:
Marcus Aurelius: Stoic philosophy and emotional resilience
Eliyahu Goldratt: Systems thinking and Theory of Constraints
Kim Scott: Radical Candor and feedback frameworks
Patrick Lencioni: Team health and organizational dysfunction
Cal Newport: Deep work and attention management
My former CTO (anonymized): Strategic thinking and org design
When I was stuck, I’d ask: “What would the Advisory Board say about this situation?”
Claude would give me multiple perspectives:
Marcus Aurelius’ perspective: “You’re anxious about outcomes you don’t control. The only thing you control is your own reasoning and decisions. Focus there.”
Goldratt’s perspective: “This sounds like a constraint problem. Your team can’t move faster because you’re the bottleneck—you’re reviewing every PR. Delegate or automate that constraint.”
Kim Scott’s perspective: “You’re avoiding giving direct feedback because you care personally. But caring personally also means being willing to challenge directly. That’s Radical Candor.”
Cal Newport’s perspective: “You’re context-switching too much. Your calendar has 8 meetings with 30-minute gaps between them. No wonder you can’t focus on strategic work.”
Was this perfect? No. But it gave me frameworks to think differently about my problems.
You should create your own Advisory Board. Who would you want in the room when making tough decisions? Add them to your system.
What Actually Changed After 90 Days
Let me be specific about the results:
Stress management: I stopped carrying emotional weight from one day to the next. My sleep quality improved noticeably. My overall stress dropped significantly—I felt calmer and more in control even during chaotic weeks.
Self-awareness: I learned which types of meetings drain me (large stakeholder syncs with no clear agenda), which conflicts I avoid (delivering negative feedback to people I respect), and what actually energizes me (1-on-1 problem-solving sessions).
Career clarity: I realized I was spending 70% of my time on execution and 30% on strategy, when I needed the inverse to prepare for a Head of Engineering role. That insight changed how I allocated my calendar.
Management evolution: I stopped managing people the way I was taught and started managing them based on what actually worked for my personality and team dynamics. I got better at direct feedback because I could see the cost of avoidance in my own journals.
Pattern recognition: The AI caught recurring issues I’d been blind to—like having the same conflict with a team member for two months without addressing it directly, or feeling drained every Thursday afternoon because I’d front-loaded my week with too many decisions.
How to Start This Yourself (Step by Step)
You don’t need to copy my system exactly. But here’s how to start:
Week 1: Set Up Your Infrastructure
Create a Notion workspace (or use any note-taking tool—I just like Notion’s templates)
Get a voice transcription tool if you want to use voice—I used Superwhisper, but your phone’s built-in recorder works too
Build your templates using the checklists I shared above—start with just one session if three feels overwhelming
Create a Claude project (or ChatGPT, Gemini—any LLM works) and add context about yourself: your role, your goals, your challenges
Write your AI prompts based on the examples I gave—customize them for your situation
Week 2-4: Build the Habit
Pick your session times and protect them—I set calendar blocks for the first two weeks until it became automatic
Start with one session daily if three feels like too much (evening is the easiest place to start)
Use voice recording for at least one session—try it during a walk or commute
Don’t aim for perfection—I hit maybe 80-85% of days; that’s fine
Week 4+: Add the Weekly Summaries
Keep one running Claude conversation per week where you paste your daily entries
Every Sunday, request the summary artifact using the prompt structure I shared
Add each summary to your project knowledge so Claude can reference it later
Review your summaries monthly to spot longer-term patterns
Month 2-3: Create Your Advisory Board
List 3-5 people or frameworks you respect
Add them to your project knowledge with brief descriptions of their philosophies
Ask “What would the Advisory Board say?” when you’re stuck on decisions
Common Objections (And My Responses)
“30 minutes a day is too much time.”
Fair. Start with one 10-minute evening session. Even that will give you results. But honestly? If you don’t have 30 minutes to understand yourself better, that’s exactly why you need this.
“What if I miss days?”
I missed 10-15% of days. The system still worked. Consistency matters more than perfection. Even 4-5 days a week will show you patterns.
Your Turn
You don’t have to commit to 90 days. Start with one week. Use the templates I shared. See what patterns emerge.
After 7 days, you’ll already see things you didn’t notice before. After 30 days, you’ll understand behaviors you’ve had for years. After 90 days, you’ll wonder how you functioned without this level of self-awareness.
If you found this valuable, consider subscribing. Investing in your growth as a leader is one of the best decisions you can make – and it starts with the content you consume.
Share this with another engineering manager who might need it.



Thank you for this excellent and, above all, practical article. I have been writing three pages in my journal every morning for many years and have gained tremendous clarity as a result. Your approach sounds even better, especially because AI helps you draw conclusions that you would have long forgotten. The advisory board idea is also brilliant. I've tried something similar before when making important decisions, but after reading your article, I'll definitely use it more often.
With ChatGPT, you can speak directly into the chat and it converts it to text... it works great, I only use that now.